← Between the Cracks
Entry 01

Tomorrow

A Between the Cracks Triptych

I · Dreaming

“We have always imagined tomorrow before we arrived there.”

Tomorrow is a three-part exploration of humanity’s changing relationship with the future: how we imagine it, how we attempt to predict it, and ultimately how we choose what to do with the possibilities we create.

The first movement begins with imagination.

Long before artificial intelligence began calculating what might come next, human beings were already constructing futures in stories, images, machines, and sound. Science fiction gave those futures landscapes. Music gave them atmosphere, emotion, and eventually a voice.

Part I asks what happened when technology allowed music not merely to accompany our visions of tomorrow, but to begin dreaming alongside them.

Surreal science-fiction illustration of a musician seated at a table in an alien landscape, accompanied by a cat and strange organic forms.
Artwork by Mœbius (Jean Giraud)

When Music Learned to Dream of Tomorrow

How electricity, jazz, cinema, electronic sound, and the human imagination taught us to hear worlds that did not yet exist.

Look closer. Listen deeper. Meet me between the cracks.

Science fiction and music both begin in the same place: the suspicion that reality is larger than it appears.

Before we ever traveled beyond the atmosphere, we had already found ways to leave the ordinary world. We did it through stories, certainly, but also through sound. A strange sequence of notes could make an invisible place suddenly feel present. A rhythm could alter our sense of time. An unfamiliar instrument could suggest a landscape no human eye had ever seen.

Perhaps this is why music and science fiction have always seemed destined to find one another.

Science fiction asks us to imagine what lies beyond the boundaries of the known: other planets, other civilizations, other technologies, other versions of ourselves. Music performs a strangely similar act without needing to describe anything at all. It can create a world without drawing its map. It can make us nostalgic for places that have never existed.

And somewhere during the twentieth century, something changed.

Electricity entered music. Magnetic tape could capture sound, cut it apart, reverse it, slow it down, and reconstruct it. Oscillators produced tones without strings, skins, reeds, or breath. The theremin seemed to pull melodies directly from empty air. Eventually synthesizers offered musicians something extraordinary: the ability not merely to reproduce the sounds of the existing world, but to invent new ones.

The future had found an instrument.

But this story begins before the synthesizer.

It begins with a much older human desire: to hear beyond the visible world.

Before the Future Had Machines

Long before music sounded futuristic, it already sounded otherworldly.

The oldest instruments were not merely tools for entertainment. Drums, flutes, rattles, bells, chants, and resonant spaces were woven into ritual, mourning, celebration, trance, worship, storytelling, and communal memory. Music gave invisible things a shape. It allowed fear, longing, ecstasy, grief, and wonder to become audible.

A cave could become more than a cave once a voice entered it.

An echo returned altered, detached from the body that created it, almost like an answer from somewhere unseen. Repetition could blur ordinary time. Rhythm could synchronize bodies. Sustained tones could make a familiar space feel charged with another kind of presence.

None of this was science fiction in the modern sense. There were no starships, artificial intelligences, or machines dreaming in neon cities. But the underlying impulse was already there: the desire to cross a boundary.

Music has always been unusually good at this because it does not need to explain where it is taking us. A story must describe a strange world. Music can simply open the door.

Perhaps that is why certain sounds have always carried a sense of the sacred, the uncanny, or the impossible. They suggest that reality contains hidden rooms.

Centuries later, technology would give musicians entirely new ways to enter those rooms.

Electricity would make the invisible audible.

Electricity Changes the Dream

Then the invisible world acquired wires.

The arrival of recorded and electronic sound changed more than the instruments musicians could use. It changed what sound itself could be. For most of human history, music had been inseparable from the moment of its creation: a hand struck a drum, breath moved through a flute, a bow pulled across a string. Sound appeared, traveled through the air, and vanished.

Recording disturbed that ancient arrangement. Suddenly a voice could survive the person speaking it. A performance could happen in one room and reappear years later in another. Radio made the transformation stranger still, carrying disembodied voices and music invisibly across enormous distances. For someone encountering these technologies for the first time, the experience must have bordered on the supernatural.

And then musicians began manipulating the signal itself.

Magnetic tape could be cut, rearranged, reversed, slowed down, accelerated, and looped. Sounds no longer had to obey the chronology in which they were created. A piano could become an abstraction. A human voice could become something inhuman. A few seconds of recorded noise could repeat indefinitely, forming patterns that had never existed in the original moment.

Electronic instruments pushed the boundary further. The theremin, played without physical contact, seemed particularly suited to this emerging sonic universe. Its eerie sliding tones would eventually become inseparable from popular images of flying saucers, laboratories, extraterrestrials, and technological unease.

Something profound had happened.

For thousands of years, musicians had transformed the sounds available in the world around them. Now they could begin creating sounds that seemed to come from somewhere else entirely.

Music was no longer simply imagining the unknown.

It was beginning to manufacture it.

The Twentieth Century Hears Tomorrow

By the middle of the twentieth century, the future was no longer a distant philosophical abstraction. It had become part of everyday culture.

Rockets climbed into the atmosphere. Nuclear weapons made civilization’s destruction technologically imaginable. Computers began their slow migration from laboratories toward ordinary life. Television carried distant events into living rooms. Humanity seemed to be accelerating toward something enormous without knowing whether it was utopia or catastrophe.

Science fiction absorbed that uncertainty, and music began giving it a voice.

Electronic sound was particularly suited to the task because it carried so little historical baggage. A violin arrived with centuries of memory attached to it. An electronic tone could seem almost parentless. It might suggest machinery, extraterrestrial intelligence, empty space, or a civilization that had not yet been born.

The synthesizer expanded that vocabulary dramatically. Musicians were no longer limited to manipulating recordings of existing sounds. They could construct sound itself: shaping oscillations, filtering frequencies, bending pitch, stretching tones into textures that had no obvious counterpart in the acoustic world.

Suddenly the future became something you could hear.

But the strange thing about this new sonic frontier was that it did not produce a single vision of tomorrow.

Sometimes the future sounded sterile and mechanical. Sometimes it sounded terrifying. Sometimes playful. Sometimes impossibly beautiful. The same technology that could evoke a laboratory or alien spacecraft could also produce something deeply intimate and human.

Perhaps that contradiction explains why electronic sound became so inseparable from science fiction. Our machines have always carried both sides of our imagination inside them: the fear that technology will estrange us from ourselves, and the hope that it might reveal possibilities we could never reach alone.

Yet some musicians were beginning to imagine something even more radical.

They were not simply asking what the future might sound like.

They were asking who was allowed to imagine it.

Jazz Leaves the Planet

For Sun Ra, space was more than scenery.

Born Herman Blount in Birmingham, Alabama, he constructed an artistic identity around the idea that he had come from Saturn. His mythology was deliberately strange: part science fiction, part spiritual cosmology, part performance art, part refusal to accept the reality history had assigned him.

Behind the spaceships and metallic costumes was a serious proposition. If the existing world had been shaped by histories of oppression, exclusion, and stolen possibility, perhaps imagining another world could become an act of liberation.

The future could be somewhere freedom had not yet been denied.

This impulse would become central to what we now call Afrofuturism: the convergence of Black culture, technology, speculative imagination, mythology, and visions of alternate futures. In Sun Ra’s hands, jazz became a spacecraft. Ancient Egypt could coexist with Saturn. Electronics could mingle with swing. Myth could rewrite history forward instead of merely looking backward.

And jazz was uniquely equipped for this voyage because improvisation already contained something science fictional within it.

An improviser stands at the edge of an unwritten future.

A note is played. It changes the possibilities available for the next note. Another musician responds. A rhythm shifts. A harmonic door opens unexpectedly, and everyone enters it together. The destination does not fully exist until the musicians arrive there.

A jazz solo, in this sense, is a small act of speculative fiction.

It asks: What if we went here instead?

By the late 1960s and 1970s, that question was being amplified through electricity. Miles Davis pushed jazz into increasingly strange terrain, surrounding improvisation with electric keyboards, effects, amplified instruments, studio manipulation, rock rhythms, and dense fields of sound. On records such as Bitches Brew, the studio itself became part of the composition.

The result could feel less like musicians performing songs than a group navigating an environment.

Jazz fusion pushed further into that territory. Electric keyboards shimmered beside distorted guitars. Synthesizers appeared beside acoustic instruments. Rhythms fractured, accelerated, and recombined. Technology did not erase the human element. It gave improvisation new landscapes in which to wander.

Perhaps this is where the relationship between science fiction and music becomes clearest.

Both begin with the known.

Then someone asks what happens if we refuse to stop there.

Cinema Gives the Future a Soul

Science fiction cinema faced a peculiar problem: it could show us the impossible, but it still had to make us feel something about it.

A spacecraft could drift across a screen with astonishing realism. A city could rise beneath artificial lights. A machine could speak with a human voice. But images alone could not determine whether these things should inspire wonder, terror, loneliness, or awe.

Music became the emotional gravity holding these imaginary worlds together.

Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey demonstrated this in an unexpected way. Rather than relying entirely on newly composed futuristic music, the film placed images of spacecraft against compositions that already carried histories of their own. Johann Strauss II’s The Blue Danube transforms orbital machinery into an elegant dance. Richard Strauss’s Also sprach Zarathustra gives human evolution the scale of myth.

The future, strangely, was being interpreted through the past.

That contradiction would become one of science fiction music’s most enduring qualities.

Because when we imagine the future, we rarely leave ourselves behind.

Nowhere is this more haunting than in Blade Runner.

Ridley Scott’s Los Angeles of 2019 is crowded with technological marvels, but it does not feel clean or new. Rain falls through neon. Buildings loom over crowded streets. Advertisements glow above decay. The future has arrived, yet somehow it already seems exhausted.

Vangelis gave that world its pulse.

His synthesizers could sound enormous and artificial, yet the emotions moving through them were painfully human. Electronic textures drift beside saxophone, voices, and melodies saturated with longing. The score does not simply tell us that we have entered the future. It makes that future feel as though it remembers something it has lost.

This is one of the strangest powers of science-fiction music: it can make us nostalgic for a time that has never happened.

Perhaps that is because science fiction is rarely concerned with technology alone. Beneath its androids, spacecraft, artificial intelligences, and distant planets are very old questions.

What makes someone human?

What survives us?

What happens to memory?

What do we become when the world changes faster than our hearts can follow?

Music carries those questions particularly well because it can hold contradiction without resolving it. A synthesizer can sound technological and mournful at once. A machine can produce a tone that makes us ache. Something unmistakably artificial can reveal something unmistakably human.

The future had acquired a soundtrack.

And increasingly, that soundtrack was not telling us what tomorrow would look like.

It was asking how tomorrow might feel.

The Future Turns Inward

Eventually, the spaceship became unnecessary.

By the late twentieth century, some of music’s most compelling imagined worlds were not distant planets at all. They were states of mind.

Ambient music offered one path inward. Brian Eno famously approached ambient music as something capable of altering our perception of an environment rather than simply demanding our attention. The music could recede into the architecture of a room and then suddenly become noticeable again, changing according to the listener’s awareness.

This represented a different kind of futurism.

Instead of asking where technology might take the human body, it asked what sound might do to human perception.

Electronic music continued expanding into countless forms. Synthesizers, samplers, drum machines, computers, digital effects, and eventually software placed entire imaginary environments within reach of individual musicians. Sounds that once required laboratories full of equipment could eventually be summoned from a laptop in a bedroom.

The boundary between instrument and machine became increasingly difficult to locate.

So did the boundary between musician and technology.

And now we have arrived at an even stranger threshold.

Artificial intelligence can generate melodies, arrangements, voices, textures, and entire pieces of music from instructions written in ordinary language. Algorithms can recommend what we hear, imitate musical characteristics, separate voices from recordings, reconstruct damaged audio, and participate in processes once understood as exclusively human acts of creation.

The questions this raises are larger than whether the results sound convincing.

If a machine can produce something beautiful, where does the beauty reside?

In the machine?

In the person who directed it?

In the human music from which these systems learned?

Or does beauty ultimately occur somewhere else entirely, in the consciousness of the listener?

Science fiction has been circling questions like these for generations. What happens when our tools begin imitating qualities we once used to define ourselves? What becomes of authorship when creativity is shared between human intention and increasingly autonomous systems? At what point does an instrument become something closer to a collaborator?

There are no simple answers yet.

Perhaps there should not be.

The synthesizer once seemed alien. Recorded voices once seemed uncanny. Electronic instruments were accused of removing humanity from music, only to become vehicles for some of the most intimate music ever made.

Technology changes.

The deeper human desire appears remarkably persistent.

We keep building new instruments with which to reach beyond the boundaries of what we already know.

The destination has simply moved.

Once we looked toward the stars.

Now, increasingly, we are looking into the strange territory between mind and machine.

Listening for Tomorrow

So why have music and science fiction continued to find each other?

Perhaps because neither is really about the future.

Science fiction dresses itself in tomorrow: distant planets, impossible machines, artificial minds, civilizations not yet born. Music can do something similar through unfamiliar sounds, strange technologies, invented textures, and instruments capable of suggesting places that have never existed.

But underneath all of that speculation is something much older.

Us.

Every imagined future carries traces of the people imagining it. Our hopes travel there. So do our fears. Our loneliness, our curiosity, our hunger for transcendence, our anxiety about what we are becoming and our suspicion that somewhere beyond the boundaries of the familiar, another way of being might be possible.

Music carries those things without needing to name them.

That may be why a synthesizer can make us nostalgic for a city that never existed. Why a jazz improvisation can make time seem briefly negotiable. Why a film score can make an imaginary planet feel like somewhere we have somehow already been. Why a machine generating music can suddenly force us into ancient questions about creativity, beauty, consciousness, and what it means to be human.

We build new technologies, but we bring old mysteries with us.

The instruments change. The questions remain.

Perhaps that is what we have been hearing all along.

The echo in the cave, the signal traveling invisibly through a radio, the theremin trembling beneath an unseen hand, Sun Ra departing for Saturn, Miles Davis disappearing into electricity, Vangelis illuminating a rain-soaked future, ambient music dissolving the walls of a room, algorithms learning the contours of human song: they belong to different centuries and different visions of the world.

Yet each contains the same gesture.

A reaching beyond.

Science fiction reaches beyond the world we have inherited and asks what else might exist.

Music reaches beyond language and asks what else we might feel.

And occasionally, somewhere between those two questions, something extraordinary happens. We encounter an impossible world and recognize ourselves inside it.

Maybe this is why the future has always needed music.

Not because music can tell us what tomorrow will sound like. It cannot.

But because before we can build a different world, we must first become capable of imagining one.

And sometimes imagination begins not with an image, an equation, or a machine.

Sometimes it begins with a sound.

A vibration in the darkness.

A strange frequency arriving from somewhere we cannot quite locate.

Something slipping through the cracks, reminding us of the suspicion with which we began:

Reality may be larger than it appears.

And there is still so much left to hear.

Stay curious. Keep listening for the signal.

And follow your bliss.

Tomorrow continues II · Remembering The Machine That Remembers Tomorrow If machines can learn patterns from what humanity has already said and done, how much of what happens next might eventually become predictable? Next in Between the Cracks